<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Athlademic Ratings - Revised</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/</link>
	<description>the ubiquitous college basketblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Your APR? &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Your APR? &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>[...] 31.3% of its members.  As far as we can tell, there isn&#8217;t much of  a correlation with our 2007 Athlademic Ratings from last summer.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 31.3% of its members.  As far as we can tell, there isn&#8217;t much of  a correlation with our 2007 Athlademic Ratings from last summer.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCH</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-3040</link>
		<dc:creator>TCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-3040</guid>
		<description>With the retirement of Bob Knight I've been in discussions about graduation rates versus coaches. So I ran across this web site and found it very interesting.
I was surprised to see Indiana so low and also as you mentioned Marquette.
Is there anywhere to see this data broken down by sport? And then what about by coaches? I would think Dick Bennett would be at or near the top. (When at UW Green Bay UW Wisconsin and then I forget where he went).
Anyway good material!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the retirement of Bob Knight I&#8217;ve been in discussions about graduation rates versus coaches. So I ran across this web site and found it very interesting.<br />
I was surprised to see Indiana so low and also as you mentioned Marquette.<br />
Is there anywhere to see this data broken down by sport? And then what about by coaches? I would think Dick Bennett would be at or near the top. (When at UW Green Bay UW Wisconsin and then I forget where he went).<br />
Anyway good material!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmsf</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>rtmsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>4 of the top 7 are CA schools.  Cali's gettin it done on and off the fields of play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 of the top 7 are CA schools.  Cali&#8217;s gettin it done on and off the fields of play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks for the update!</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks for the update!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>This looks a lot better.  I really don't understand the NCSA.   The other item I would like to highlight is that the nation's BEST public schools are also in the TOP 10 on this list - Cal, Virginia, UCLA, Michigan, and UNC are also the nation's TOP 5 public schools and I believe it is in that order (okay, so UCLA and Michigan are tied at third and I wanted to place UCLA before Michigan).  The other fun fact here is that Duke and UNC are the two D1 athletic programs in closest proximity to one another in terms of distance.  UCLA and USC are the only two D1 football programs in the same city (not true for basketball, one example includes Xavier and Cincy).  Even though UCLA and USC are in the same city, Duke and UNC are closer to one another than we are.  I think UCLA and USC is second in terms of D1 programs and distance.  Funny that all 4 schools are also in the top 10.  Also, Pac-10 doesn't just have 5 in the top 20 but we also have 4 in the top 10 - and all 4 of those schools are the CA representatives of the Pac-10!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks a lot better.  I really don&#8217;t understand the NCSA.   The other item I would like to highlight is that the nation&#8217;s BEST public schools are also in the TOP 10 on this list - Cal, Virginia, UCLA, Michigan, and UNC are also the nation&#8217;s TOP 5 public schools and I believe it is in that order (okay, so UCLA and Michigan are tied at third and I wanted to place UCLA before Michigan).  The other fun fact here is that Duke and UNC are the two D1 athletic programs in closest proximity to one another in terms of distance.  UCLA and USC are the only two D1 football programs in the same city (not true for basketball, one example includes Xavier and Cincy).  Even though UCLA and USC are in the same city, Duke and UNC are closer to one another than we are.  I think UCLA and USC is second in terms of D1 programs and distance.  Funny that all 4 schools are also in the top 10.  Also, Pac-10 doesn&#8217;t just have 5 in the top 20 but we also have 4 in the top 10 - and all 4 of those schools are the CA representatives of the Pac-10!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NCAA D1 Athlademic Ratings &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>NCAA D1 Athlademic Ratings &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/2007-athlademic-ratings-revised/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>[...] Update #2:  After reviewing NCSA&#8217;s data, we decided a whole new post was warranted.  We revamp the entire list and also take a look at how the BCS conferences stack up in our Athlademic Ratings - Revised.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update #2:  After reviewing NCSA&#8217;s data, we decided a whole new post was warranted.  We revamp the entire list and also take a look at how the BCS conferences stack up in our Athlademic Ratings - Revised.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
